Skip to main content
Civil Litigation
27 August 20265 min read

Compensation for Damages Under UAE Civil Law: Harmful Acts, Moral Harm and How Courts Assess the Award

By Milad MevleviEditorially reviewed by LEXAI

Brass balance scales tilted on a dark walnut desk beside a closed leather case folder under warm gold light

A supplier abandoned the job halfway. A driver ran a red light. A former business partner published something untrue and your phone stopped ringing. Different facts, same first question: can you make the other side pay, and how much? UAE law answers that through the harmful-act rules of the civil code, and the answer is far more structured than most claimants expect.

Direct answer. Yes — a person who causes harm to another in the UAE must make that harm good, and you claim it as a civil damages claim (da'wa ta'weed) under Federal Decree-Law No. 25 of 2025 promulgating the Civil Transactions Law, which took effect on 1 June 2026. You must prove three things: a harmful act, real damage, and a causal link between the two. Compensation is then measured by the loss you actually suffered plus the profit you actually lost, provided that loss is a natural consequence of the act. UAE courts compensate; they do not punish. This guide covers what counts as harm, how material and moral damage differ, how a court fixes the figure, what happens when both sides are at fault, the deadlines, and how you get paid at the end.

What UAE law means by a harmful act (al-fi'l al-darr)

A harmful act is one of the recognised sources of an obligation, sitting alongside contracts and unjust enrichment.

The Civil Transactions Law lists the sources of obligation in Article 112, and the harmful act — the civil-law equivalent of what common-law systems call a tort — is one of them. Chapter Three of the same book then sets out the whole liability regime. Article 245 confirms that the chapter applies to liability arising from a harmful act committed by a natural or a legal person, so a company can be the defendant as easily as an individual. You can read the full consolidated text on the Civil Transactions Law page, and the official Arabic version is published on the UAE Ministry of Justice legislation portal.

Article 245 also settles a point that confuses many claimants: civil liability and criminal liability run on separate tracks. A criminal penalty has no effect on determining the scope of civil liability or on assessing the compensation. An acquittal in the criminal court does not automatically end the civil claim, and a conviction does not fix the civil figure.

The three things you have to prove

You carry the burden, and you carry it on all three elements.

  • A harmful act. Some conduct — deliberate, careless, or in some cases simply the fact of controlling a dangerous thing — that the law treats as wrongful.
  • Actual damage. A real loss, not a theoretical one. It can be financial, physical, or moral.
  • A causal link. The damage must be a natural consequence of the act. This is where most weak claims die.

The burden itself comes from the Law of Evidence in Civil and Commercial Transactions, Federal Decree-Law No. 35 of 2022, whose opening articles put the onus of proof on the claimant and require that the facts you seek to prove are relevant and admissible. Practical detail on what the court will and will not accept is set out in our guide to evidence rules in UAE civil courts.

When the chain breaks: external cause and force majeure

If the harm came from outside the defendant's control, liability falls away.

Article 249 is explicit: where a person proves the harm arose from an external cause beyond their control — an act of God, a sudden accident, force majeure, the act of a third party, or the act of the injured party — they are not liable, unless a law or an agreement says otherwise. Related defences follow: lawful self-defence within necessary limits (Article 250), and acting to avert a greater imminent harm, where the court awards only what it considers appropriate (Article 252).

Compensation for harm under UAE law: what the code actually says

The measure is your real loss plus your lost profit, and nothing beyond that.

Article 255 states the rule in one sentence: in all cases, compensation is assessed based on the extent of the loss suffered by the injured party and the loss of their profit, provided that this is a natural consequence of the harmful act. Two things follow. First, exemplary or punitive sums have no home in this formula — the ceiling is what you can prove you lost. Second, "natural consequence" is a real filter: a remote knock-on loss several steps down the chain will usually be argued away.

Article 257 adds a protection worth knowing. Any clause purporting to exempt or mitigate liability arising from a harmful act is void. A supplier cannot contract out of harmful-act liability with small print. Parties may agree to make that liability heavier, but not lighter.

Material damage, moral damage (al-darar al-adabi) and lost profit

UAE law compensates three distinct categories, and you should plead each one separately.

Material damage is the measurable, out-of-pocket loss: repair invoices, medical bills, replacement cost, wasted expenditure, professional fees. It is the easiest head to prove and the easiest to lose through poor documentation.

Moral damage in the UAE

Moral harm is expressly compensable, and the code defines it.

Article 254 provides that liability includes moral harm, and then gives content to the term: an infringement on another's freedom, honour, reputation, social standing, or financial standing constitutes moral harm. This is the statutory basis for claims that non-UAE readers often assume do not exist here — defamation, reputational injury, distress flowing from an assault. Our guide to defamation under UAE law covers the criminal side of that same conduct.

Two further rules in Article 254 matter in practice:

  • Compensation for moral harm may be awarded to spouses and relatives up to the second degree for the moral harm they suffer as a result of the incapacity or death of the injured person.
  • The right to claim compensation for moral harm is not transferable to another person unless its value has already been fixed by agreement or by a final judgment.

Moral-damage awards in the UAE are typically modest compared with the material head. Courts treat them as recognition of the injury rather than a windfall, and there is no published tariff — the figure is a matter for the trial court's discretion.

Lost profit (al-kasb al-fa'it)

Lost profit is recoverable, but only where it was a natural consequence and you can evidence it.

Article 255 puts lost profit on the same footing as actual loss. For a business claim this is often the largest head: cancelled orders, a contract that fell through, the margin on work you could not perform. The evidential bar is the problem. Historic accounts, signed purchase orders, and a coherent expert-supported model succeed; a spreadsheet projecting what the business "would have" earned rarely does.

How UAE courts assess the award — and why punitive sums are rare

The court fixes the figure, usually with an expert's help, and it is bound by the compensatory measure in Article 255.

Article 256 sets out the mechanics and gives the court more flexibility than people expect:

  • Compensation is assessed in cash as the default.
  • On the injured party's request, the court may instead order restoration of the position that existed before the harm, or order performance of a specific matter connected with the harmful act, by way of compensation.
  • Compensation may be awarded in instalments or as a periodic income, in which case the court may require security or an acceptable guarantee, and may revisit the assessment if circumstances and prices change.
  • The injured party may ask for the assessment to be reconsidered if the damage worsens.
  • Where the court cannot definitively assess the figure at the time of judgment, it must reserve the injured party's right to ask for a reassessment within a period it sets.

That last point is the practical answer to the common worry about long-tail injuries: the law contemplates that some damage is not fully known on judgment day.

The court-appointed expert

In most damages claims the number is proposed by an expert, not argued from the bar table.

UAE civil courts routinely appoint an independent expert (khibra) to examine the file, hear the parties, and report on causation and quantum. The appointment, the deposit, and the objection procedure are governed by the Civil Procedure Code, Federal Decree-Law No. 42 of 2022, and the Law of Evidence, which treats expert opinion as one of the recognised means of proof — see the Law of Evidence page. The expert's report is not binding on the court, but in practice the judgment tracks it far more often than not, which makes the expert stage the single most important part of a damages claim. The exact expert fee deposit is set by the competent court and can change; confirm the current schedule with the relevant UAE court or a licensed UAE lawyer.

Cash, instalments, or putting things back

Money is the default, but it is not the only remedy the court can order.

Where the harm is ongoing — an encroaching structure, a continuing nuisance, a publication still online — restoration of the previous position under Article 256 can be worth more than the cash figure. Ask for it expressly in the statement of claim; the court acts on the injured party's request.

Contributory fault and multiple wrongdoers

If you helped cause the harm, the award shrinks; if several people caused it, the court apportions.

Article 253 handles both situations in two short paragraphs:

  • Where several persons are responsible for the harm, each is liable in proportion to their share in it, and the court may rule that they are liable equally or jointly and severally. Joint and several liability matters commercially: it lets you enforce the whole judgment against the solvent defendant.
  • Where the injured party contributed by their own act to causing the harm or aggravated it, the court may reduce the compensation or decline to award it at all.

Vicarious and custodial liability sit alongside this. A principal is liable for harm resulting from a harmful act committed by a subordinate in the performance of their duty or because of it (Article 266). The guardian of a thing — anyone exercising actual control over it, with the owner presumed to be the guardian — carries liability for animals (Article 269), for building collapse (Article 270), and for things requiring special care or mechanical machinery (Article 271), subject in each case to proof of an external cause.

Contract damages versus harmful-act damages

They are different regimes, and the difference decides whether you must send a formal notice first.

Where the loss flows from a broken contract, the starting point is compulsory performance: after the debtor is put in default, they are compelled to perform in kind wherever possible, and the court may limit the creditor to monetary compensation only where performance in kind would be excessively onerous (Article 331). Compensation is then generally not due unless the debtor has been formally put in default (Article 337). Article 338 carves out the exceptions — and one of them is decisive here: no notice is required where the obligation is compensation arising from an unlawful act. A harmful-act claim does not wait on a demand letter.

If the parties fixed the figure in advance, Article 340 governs. The court may reduce agreed compensation that the debtor proves was excessive or where the obligation was partly performed, may reduce or refuse it where the creditor's own fault contributed, and may allow the creditor more than the agreed sum on proof of fraud or gross fault. Any agreement contrary to those rules is void. The detail sits in our guide to liquidated damages and penalty clauses, and the wider contractual picture in remedies for breach of contract.

How a damages claim (da'wa ta'weed) runs through the courts

You file in the civil court with jurisdiction, pay a filing fee, and the case usually routes through an expert before judgment.

The sequence, the filing steps and the realistic timeline are covered end to end in our guide to how a civil lawsuit works in the UAE. Two upstream questions decide where you start: which emirate's courts have jurisdiction, and whether your dispute belongs in the onshore courts or a financial free-zone court. Our guide to which UAE court handles your case walks through that. The procedural framework itself is the Civil Procedure Code — see the Civil Procedure Code page.

Filing, fees and evidence

Court fees are charged on the value of the claim, so the amount you plead has a cost.

The exact court fee percentage and cap are set by each emirate's judicial authority and can change; confirm the current schedule with the relevant UAE court or a licensed UAE lawyer. You can model the likely figure with our court fee calculator. Practical evidence points that decide damages claims:

  • File the invoices, contracts, and correspondence with the statement of claim, not later.
  • Get a contemporaneous record of the harm — photographs, a medical report, a police report — before it becomes reconstructive.
  • Documents in a foreign language will need [legal translation](/dictionary/legal-translation); budget for it.
  • Quantify each head of loss separately: material, moral, and lost profit.

Claiming damages alongside a criminal case

You can attach a civil claim to the criminal proceedings, or run it separately in the civil court.

Where the harmful act is also an offence, an injured party may bring a civil claim within the criminal case. It is quicker and cheaper, and the criminal file does the evidential work. The trade-off is control and quantum: criminal courts frequently award a nominal sum and refer the claimant to the civil court for full assessment. Because Article 245 keeps the two tracks separate — the penalty does not determine the scope of civil liability — a separate civil claim remains available where the criminal award falls short.

Time limits: when a damages claim stops being heard

There is a deadline, missing it is fatal in practice, and the court will not raise it for you.

The general rule in Article 429 is that a right is not extinguished by the passage of time, but a claim on it is not admissible against a denier after fifteen years without an accepted excuse — except where the law fixes another period. Harmful-act claims fall into that exception, and Article 258 sets the period. A claim for compensation arising from a harmful act is not admissible after three years from the day the injured party became aware of the damage and of the person responsible for it, and in all cases it is not admissible after fifteen years from the date the harmful act occurred. The same article builds in one extension: where the claim arises from a crime and the criminal action is still admissible after those three years have run, the period for the compensation claim does not begin until the criminal action ends. Read Articles 258 and 429 in the consolidated text on the Civil Transactions Law page; the federal government explains how UAE laws are issued and how to find the in-force version on the official portal. A licensed UAE lawyer should confirm which period runs on your specific facts. Work-injury and motor-insurance claims carry their own separate deadlines.

Three rules soften the edges, and one hardens them:

  • The period is suspended while an acceptable excuse makes it impossible to claim, and for a person lacking legal capacity, absent, or missing, unless they have a legal representative (Article 437).
  • It is interrupted by the debtor's express or implied acknowledgment of the right (Article 439), and by a judicial claim or any judicial step you take to assert the right (Article 440). After an interruption a fresh period of the same length starts (Article 441).
  • You cannot agree in advance to a different period, and a waiver of the defence before it arises is invalid (Article 443).
  • The court may not raise limitation on its own motion — it rules on it only if the debtor or an interested litigant asks (Article 444). See limitation period for the term itself.

Bodily injury, diya and arsh

Bodily harm is compensable, and Islamic-law compensation can sit alongside a civil award.

Article 259 requires compensation for bodily harm inflicted on a person, and adds that where blood money (diya) or arsh is due, the court may, on the injured party's request, award compensation for material and moral harm not covered by the diya or arsh. The exact diya figure is set by federal legislation and can change; confirm the current amount with the UAE Ministry of Justice or a licensed UAE lawyer. One practical protection: a claim for compensation for bodily injury is excluded from legal set-off (Article 321), so a defendant cannot simply net it off against a debt you owe them.

Injury-specific procedure — accident reports, insurer involvement, medical committees — is covered in our guide to personal injury claims in the UAE, and the clinical-standard question in medical negligence claims.

Getting paid: enforcement after judgment

A judgment is not money; enforcement is a separate stage with its own file.

Once the judgment becomes enforceable, you open an execution file before the execution judge, who can attach bank accounts, salaries, vehicles and property, and impose travel restrictions in the cases the law allows. Enforcement is governed by the Civil Procedure Code. The realistic point for claimants: check the defendant's ability to pay before you invest in a large claim. A well-reasoned judgment against an empty company is an expensive piece of paper. See damages and compensation for how the terms are used across UAE court documents.

What the 2026 Civil Transactions Law changed

The doctrine is recognisably continuous, but the article numbers moved — and that trips up anyone working from older material.

Federal Decree-Law No. 25 of 2025 promulgating the Civil Transactions Law was issued on 1 October 2025 and took effect on 1 June 2026, and it is a long code — its final provision is Article 1422. It is the civil code UAE courts now apply, and it replaces the code that had governed civil transactions since the 1980s. Every article cited in this guide is a provision of the 2025 law. Older commentary, judgments and templates cite the previous numbering, so a reference you find online may point at an article number that no longer holds the provision described. Always confirm the current number against the consolidated text on the Civil Transactions Law page or on the UAE Ministry of Justice legislation portal before you rely on it. The federal government also explains how to find the in-force version of a UAE law on the official portal.

The substantive framework — harmful act, damage, causal link; material and moral harm; lost profit as a natural consequence; contributory fault and apportionment — is the framework UAE courts have applied for decades, restated.

What to do now

Work out which head of loss you actually have, gather the proof of it, then get a specialist to price the claim before you file.

  1. Write down the act, the date, and every loss it caused, splitting material, moral and lost profit.
  2. Collect the documents that prove each figure — and the documents that prove the timing, because the deadline runs from knowledge.
  3. Check who the correct defendant is: the individual, the employer, or the guardian of the thing.
  4. Get an assessment of whether the sum is worth the court fee and the expert stage.
  5. Confirm the deadline that applies to your specific claim before doing anything else.

The federal government portal publishes general guidance on UAE litigation procedures.

When you are ready for advice on your own facts, you can browse verified UAE civil litigation lawyers on LEXAI, filter by practice area, emirate and language, and contact them directly. Browsing and comparing is free. LEXAI lists and verifies lawyers — you engage and pay the lawyer directly, and the fee arrangement is between you and them.

Last updated 27 August 2026

Ask AI About This Topic

Get instant AI answers

Find a Specialist Lawyer

Civil Litigation

Frequently Asked Questions

Talk to a Civil Litigation lawyer in the UAE

Browse UAE lawyers ready to help with your matter.

View all lawyers
Mohammed Al-Salhi
New on LEXAI

Mohammed Al-Salhi

Spotlight42/100New

Corporate Commercial, Criminal Law +8

Mohammed Al-Salhi is a corporate legal consultant based in Abu Dhabi, working with Dr. Ahmed Al-Memari Law Firm & Legal Consultancy. He advises startups and digital businesses on governance and contract drafting, including employment and digital-services contracts, partner agreements, privacy policies and website terms of use, and provides preventive commercial legal advice. He specialises in legal design and structured contract drafting, and studied at Al Buraimi University College in the Sultanate of Oman.

Abu Dhabi
6 years
Arabic, English

Contact for fees

Eman Abdelall
New on LEXAI

Eman Abdelall

Spotlight31/100New

General, Corporate Commercial +8

Eman Abd Elall is a UAE-based legal counsel who advises companies across the full commercial lifecycle, from how a business is structured to how it resolves a dispute. Her corporate work covers structuring and governance alongside the agreements a business runs on, including master service agreements, service level agreements, share purchase agreements and shareholders' agreements. On the employment side she advises under the UAE Labour Law (Federal Decree-Law 33/2021), covering contracts, workforce restructuring and end-of-service entitlements. When matters turn contentious, Eman manages proceedings before the onshore courts and arbitration at DIAC and arbitrateAD (formerly ADCCAC), coordinating with licensed advocates where court representation is required. She also guides business leaders through regulatory compliance, including Economic Substance Regulations, Ultimate Beneficial Owner reporting and anti-money laundering obligations. Beyond individual matters, she builds the templates, playbooks and processes that let legal teams handle routine work without escalating everything. Areas of focus: corporate structuring and governance, commercial contracts, employment law, dispute management, arbitration, regulatory compliance.

Abu Dhabi
10 years
English, Arabic

Contact for fees

Mohammed Yasser Kassem
New on LEXAIVerified

Mohammed Yasser Kassem

Spotlight60/100Building

Civil Litigation, Criminal Law +8

Mohammad Yasser Kassem is a legal consultant at Othman Almarzooqi Advocates and Legal Consultations in Dubai, registered with the Dubai Legal Affairs Department, and founder of KASSEM & Co. He has more than 10 years of experience in the UAE, focusing on litigation, family law, and commercial matters. He represents individuals and businesses in disputes before the UAE courts, holds a law degree, is a member of the Egypt Bar Association, and works in Arabic and English.

Dubai
14 years
Arabic, English
From

AED 750 / per consultation

About the author

Founder, LEXAI

Founder of LEXAI, the UAE's first AI-powered legal marketplace. Building a free directory that connects UAE residents with bar-licensed lawyers and a free AI assistant trained on Emirates law.

View author profile

UAE Law References

This article is AI-assisted and editorially reviewed by LEXAI. It is general information, not legal advice — for advice specific to your situation, please consult a qualified lawyer licensed in the UAE.

Keep reading

Civil Litigation

The Execution Court (Tanfeedh) in the UAE: How to Enforce a Labour Judgment Against Your Employer

A labour judgment does not pay itself. This guide explains which execution court hears your file, what makes a judgment enforceable, the documents you file, the seven-day clock after service, and what happens when the employer has no assets left.

5 min read

Civil Litigation

DIFC Courts Explained: Jurisdiction, Structure and When Your Case Belongs There (2026)

A practical guide to the DIFC Courts under Dubai Law No. 2 of 2025 — the seven exclusive jurisdiction gateways, the opt-in clause, the Small Claims Tribunal ceiling, the fee scale, and how a DIFC judgment is enforced outside the centre.

5 min read

Civil Litigation

Express Attestation in the UAE: How MOFA's Fast-Track Service Works

Express attestation is MOFA's fast-track lane for legalising documents in the UAE. This guide explains standard versus urgent service, the full attestation chain from the origin country to legal translation, which documents qualify, and what lawyers and notaries attest instead.

5 min read